QED Observables
The set of experimentally measured quantities that test quantum electrodynamics. This page is the inventory — the parallel for QED of the electroweak and Standard Model observable pages, filling the gap flagged in the observables map §4. The machinery that computes each entry lives in cross-sections.md, decay-rates.md, and the general observables map, specialized to the field content of QED.
QED is the most precisely tested theory in physics: its cleanest prediction, the electron , agrees with experiment to better than one part in . The observables below are organized by the three structural classes of the observables map: (A) squared amplitudes, (B) correlator poles, (C) static vertex form factors.
1. Precision static properties (Class C)
The headline QED tests come from static electromagnetic form factors (the vertex-function parameterization) evaluated at .
1.1 The anomalous magnetic moment
| Observable | Value | Where measured |
|---|---|---|
| Electron | Harvard/Northwestern single-electron Penning trap | |
| Muon | Fermilab / BNL storage-ring |
The electron is the most precise confrontation of theory and experiment in all of science. Its QED prediction is a power series in computed to five loops (12,672 diagrams at tenth order):
the leading Schwinger term being the first-ever loop calculation (1948). The agreement with experiment is now good enough that is used to define , competitive with atom-interferometry determinations.
The muon is times more sensitive to heavy virtual particles, so it also receives sizeable electroweak and hadronic contributions and is a leading BSM probe. The status of the "muon anomaly" hinges on the hadronic vacuum-polarization input (data-driven vs. lattice QCD), an active controversy as of 2026.
1.2 Other form-factor observables
| Observable | Form factor | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Electric charge | universal; charge quantization | |
| Charge radius | slope of | the proton-radius puzzle (muonic vs. electronic hydrogen) |
| Electron EDM | -odd form factor | SM value (unobservably tiny); a nonzero measurement = new physics |
2. Bound-state spectroscopy (Class B)
Bound states are poles of the off-shell propagator, not S-matrix entries. QED predicts atomic spectra to extraordinary precision via NRQED / Bethe–Salpeter.
| Observable | Value / precision | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrogen Lamb shift () | the loop effect that launched QED (1947); self-energy + vacuum polarization | |
| Hydrogen 1S–2S transition | measured to | one of the most precise measurements ever; tests QED + fixes the Rydberg |
| Hyperfine splitting (21 cm line) | electron–proton spin–spin; limited by proton structure | |
| Positronium () spectrum & decay | 1S hyperfine, , | pure-QED bound state, no hadronic uncertainty |
| Muonium () | 1S hyperfine to ppb | cleanest test of bound-state QED + muon properties |
Positronium and muonium are prized because they contain no hadrons — every correction is pure QED, so they isolate the theory from the QCD uncertainties that limit hydrogen. The full hierarchy of approximations (Schrödinger → Dirac fine structure → Lamb shift → hyperfine) is worked out in QED/hydrogen.md.
3. Scattering cross sections (Class A)
The tree-level QED cross sections are the textbook worked examples; higher orders test the loop structure.
| Process | Result | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Compton | Klein–Nishina formula | worked end-to-end in QED/compton.md |
| Møller | -channel | polarized Møller measures at low |
| Bhabha | -channel | the luminosity monitor at colliders |
| Pair annihilation | crossing of Compton | |
| Pair production / scattering | light-by-light via a loop | is a pure quantum effect (no tree diagram) |
All follow the cross-section master formula with built from the QED Feynman rules; the general tree-level pipeline is in tree-level.md.
4. The running coupling (Class B + RG)
The fine-structure constant runs with energy scale via the renormalization group:
The low-energy value -anchored is the most accurately known fundamental constant; the growth toward the scale is the positive QED -function (charge screening) measured directly, and is a required input to every electroweak precision fit. Extrapolated far beyond, it signals the Landau pole / triviality that marks QED as an effective theory.
5. Summary: what QED observables test
| Class | Observable | Precision | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | electron | loop structure to 5 loops; defines | |
| C | muon | heavy virtual particles (BSM probe) | |
| B | Lamb shift, 1S–2S | – | bound-state QED, self-energy + vacuum polarization |
| B | positronium/muonium | ppb | pure-QED bound states (no hadrons) |
| A | Compton, Bhabha, Møller | percent–permille | tree + loop amplitudes |
| RG | at | charge screening / running |
QED is the template against which the harder theories are calibrated: QCD observables inherit its cross-section machinery but must contend with confinement and IR safety, while electroweak observables add the massive gauge bosons and parity violation.
Pointers
- QED from postulates — the theory and its successes list.
- QED/compton.md — worked cross-section calculation.
- QED/hydrogen.md — bound-state spectroscopy.
- cross-sections.md / decay-rates.md — master formulas.
- Electroweak observables / QCD observables — the sibling inventories.