Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Loop Integrals and Divergences

At tree level every amplitude is finite: the internal momenta are fixed by the external ones. Loops change this — each closed loop carries an undetermined momentum integrated over all of spacetime, , and these integrals are generically divergent in the ultraviolet (large ). This page classifies the divergences by power counting and works the canonical one-loop examples, setting up regularization and renormalization.

Conventions: , .

Where the loop integral comes from

Each Feynman diagram imposes momentum conservation at every vertex via functions. For a tree diagram these fix all internal momenta. For a diagram with independent loops, internal momenta remain unfixed and must be integrated:

where = internal lines and = vertices. Each loop contributes , and the integrand is a product of propagators at large . Whether the integral converges is a matter of counting powers.

Superficial degree of divergence

For a diagram, define the superficial degree of divergence as the net power of loop momentum in the numerator minus denominator, counting as per loop:

where are internal boson/fermion lines (bosons , fermions ). The integral behaves at large as:

BehaviorName
(or if )divergent
power divergence quadratic, quartic, …
logarithmic
convergent(superficially) finite

"Superficial" because a diagram with can still diverge through a subdiagram with ; the full statement (Weinberg's theorem) is that a diagram converges iff for the whole diagram and every subdiagram. Nested divergences are handled systematically by BPHZ.

Power counting and renormalizability

Expressing through the external lines and the coupling's mass dimension gives the central result. In four dimensions, for a theory whose couplings have mass dimension ,

with the external boson/fermion lines. The decisive fact:

  • If every coupling has (dimension operators), depends only on the external legs, so only finitely many amplitudes diverge — the theory is renormalizable.
  • If any coupling has (dimension operator), inserting more vertices raises , so infinitely many amplitudes diverge — the theory is non-renormalizable (an effective theory).

This is why the Standard Model is built from operators of dimension : it is the renormalizability criterion in disguise.

Worked example: the self-energy

The one-loop correction to the scalar propagator in theory is the "tadpole" bubble with one loop, , two internal… actually one internal line closing on the quartic vertex:

Power counting: , a quadratic divergence . It contributes a (divergent) shift to the mass — the origin of mass renormalization and of the hierarchy problem (the scalar mass is not protected by any symmetry). The is the symmetry factor.

Worked example: the vertex correction

The one-loop correction to the four-point vertex has and two internal propagators:

Power counting: , a logarithmic divergence . This is the seed of the running coupling and the renormalization group: the logarithm's argument is a ratio of scales, and demanding physics not depend on the arbitrary reference scale forces to run.

Feynman parameters and Wick rotation

Two standard tools tame these integrals before regularizing:

  • Feynman parameters combine multiple propagator denominators into one: after which the loop momentum can be shifted to complete the square, leaving an integral of the form .
  • Wick rotation (the same rotation as in the path integral) turns the Minkowski integral into a Euclidean one, , with rotational symmetry that makes the radial integral elementary.

The Euclidean integral then exhibits its divergence explicitly as the upper limit , ready for regularization.

Summary

  • Each loop = one undetermined ; .
  • Superficial degree of divergence counts net powers of : diverges ( or ).
  • Couplings of dimension ⇒ finitely many divergent amplitudes ⇒ renormalizable.
  • Feynman parameters + Wick rotation reduce loops to Euclidean radial integrals.

Where this leads

References

  • Peskin & Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Ch. 6.3, 10.1.
  • Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 1, Ch. 12.1.
  • Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory, Ch. 14, 16–18.