Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Wick's Theorem and Contractions

The Dyson series expresses the S-matrix as a sum of vacuum and in/out matrix elements of time-ordered products of free fields. Evaluating those requires converting time-ordered products into a form whose vacuum expectation values are read off immediately. Wick's theorem is the algorithm that does this: it reduces any time-ordered product to a sum of normal-ordered terms times contractions (propagators). This is the combinatorial engine behind Feynman rules.

Conventions: ; free fields as built in canonical quantization.

Normal ordering and contractions

Recall two constructions from the scalar field:

  • Normal ordering places all annihilation operators to the right, so that (unless the product is empty).
  • Splitting the field into positive- and negative-frequency parts , where (annihilation) and (creation).

The contraction of two fields — written with an overline, — is the difference between their time-ordered and normal-ordered products:

A short computation shows this is a c-number equal to the Feynman propagator:

(The vacuum expectation value of the normal-ordered term vanishes, so the contraction is the propagator.) For fermions the contraction is the Dirac propagator , and each contraction that requires reordering anticommuting fields carries a minus sign.

Statement of Wick's theorem (Theorem)

Wick's theorem. A time-ordered product of free fields equals the sum of all possible ways of contracting the fields in pairs, each accompanied by the normal-ordered product of the remaining (uncontracted) fields:

with the sum running over all pairings, including the fully contracted term when is even. Schematically, for four fields (writing for the contraction of with ):

Proof sketch. By induction, moving each through the normal-ordered product to the right; every time it passes a it generates a commutator (for bosons) or anticommutator (for fermions), which is precisely a contraction. The base case is the definition above.

Why it matters: vacuum expectation values are trivial

The point is what happens between vacuum states. Since for any non-empty normal-ordered product, only the fully contracted terms survive in a vacuum expectation value:

This is the combinatorial statement of the Feynman rules: the -point time-ordered correlator is the sum over all ways of pairing the points with propagators. For :

the three ways to connect four external points pairwise — the three "diagrams" of the free four-point function.

Contractions with external states

In an S-matrix element the time-ordered product is sandwiched between in/out Fock states rather than vacua. An external particle of momentum in the initial state is annihilated by a from one of the fields, contributing a factor ; an external particle in the final state is created by a , contributing . These external-leg contractions are what attach the internal propagator network to the physical particles, and become the external-line factors of the Feynman rules. (The LSZ formula makes this attachment precise and shows the external legs are amputated.)

Worked example: at first order

Take and the process . The first-order Dyson term is

For scattering all four external particles must contract with the four fields at the single vertex — no internal propagators at this order. The ways of assigning the four external legs to the four 's exactly cancel the , leaving the amplitude

This is the simplest Feynman rule: the vertex contributes , and the vertex is the symmetry factor that combinatorics removes for a fully-external diagram.

Summary

  • Contraction = time-ordered minus normal-ordered = the Feynman propagator (with a sign for fermions).
  • Wick's theorem rewrites any -product as a sum over all pairings.
  • In the vacuum, only fully contracted terms survive — the -point function is a sum of propagator networks.
  • External particles contribute leg factors from their contractions with the fields.

Where this leads

References

  • Peskin & Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Ch. 4.3.
  • Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 1, Ch. 6.1.
  • Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory, Ch. 8–9.